AI-generated code needs scanning. But which tool? Here's a practical comparison for indie hackers and small teams.
Overview
Built specifically for AI-generated code. Understands patterns from Cursor, Lovable, Bolt.new, and similar tools.
Strengths
AI-Specific Detection:
- Recognizes AI-generated vulnerability patterns
- Catches "confident but wrong" AI code
- Understands vibe coding context
Simplicity:
- Connect GitHub, click scan
- Plain-English explanations
- Copy-paste fixes
Speed:
- Fast scans
- No complex setup
- Quick results
Pricing
| Free | $0 | 3 repos, basic scanning |
|---|
| Pro | $29/mo | Unlimited repos, priority scanning |
|---|
| Team | $99/mo | Team features, API access |
|---|
Best For
- Vibe coders
- Solo founders
- AI-first development
- Quick security checks
Limitations
- Focused on SAST (no dependency scanning in free tier)
- Newer tool (less battle-tested)
- Limited customization
Overview
Enterprise-grade security platform covering code, dependencies, containers, and infrastructure.
Strengths
Comprehensive Coverage:
- SAST (code scanning)
- SCA (dependency scanning)
- Container scanning
- IaC scanning
Developer Experience:
- IDE plugins
- PR integrations
- Fix suggestions
Enterprise Features:
- Compliance reporting
- Policy management
- Team dashboards
Pricing
| Team | $52/dev/mo | Core features |
|---|
| Enterprise | Custom | Full platform |
|---|
Best For
- Growing teams
- Enterprise requirements
- Full security coverage
- Compliance needs
Limitations
- Complex pricing
- Can be overwhelming
- Overkill for solo devs
- Not AI-focused
Overview
Open-source static analysis with powerful custom rules. Used by security researchers and large organizations.
Strengths
Customization:
- Write custom rules
- Extensive rule registry
- Pattern-based detection
Open Source:
- Free core product
- Transparent detection
- Community rules
Power:
- Multi-language support
- Complex pattern matching
- CI/CD integration
Pricing
| Open Source | $0 | CLI, basic rules |
|---|
| Team | $40/dev/mo | Dashboard, team features |
|---|
| Enterprise | Custom | Advanced features |
|---|
Best For
- Security engineers
- Custom requirements
- Large codebases
- Research purposes
Limitations
- Steep learning curve
- Requires security knowledge
- No AI-specific rules by default
- Complex setup
Scenario 1: Solo Founder with Lovable App
Recommendation: ShipReady
Why: Fast setup, understands AI patterns, affordable, plain-English results.
Setup: Connect GitHub (2 minutes)
Scan: Click button
Fix: Follow copy-paste instructions
Total time: Minutes to get started
Scenario 2: Funded Startup, 5 Engineers
Recommendation: Snyk
Why: Growing team needs comprehensive coverage, compliance for fundraising, budget available.
Setup: Team onboarding (1 day)
Integration: CI/CD pipeline
Coverage: Code + dependencies + containers
Ongoing: Continuous monitoring
Scenario 3: Security-Conscious Developer
Recommendation: Semgrep + ShipReady
Why: Semgrep for deep customization, ShipReady for AI-specific patterns.
Semgrep: Custom rules for your patterns
ShipReady: Catch AI-specific issues
Combined: Comprehensive coverage
No single tool is best for everyone:
- ShipReady for AI-first, fast, affordable scanning
- Snyk for comprehensive, enterprise-grade security
- Semgrep for customization and control
Start with free tiers, evaluate fit, upgrade as needed.
The best security tool is the one you actually use.